Color Blindness Test

Most color blindness is red-green and inherited on the X chromosome - the National Eye Institute's color blindness guide covers the genetics and why about 1 in 12 men versus 1 in 200 women see this plate differently.
–plate 1 of 3 - what number do you see?
-plates read correctly
Plate 1a demonstration - everyone sees 12
Red-greenthe pair plates 2-3 screen for
TypeWhat is hard to tell apartShare of colorblind
Deuteranomaly (green-weak)greens, oranges and light redsthe most common, ~5% of men
Protanomaly (red-weak)reds appear darker than they are~1-2% of men
Tritanomaly (blue-yellow)blues and yellowsvery rare, under 0.01%
The plates borrow the Ishihara principle - a number drawn in one color family inside a field of a confusable family - rendered in CSS dots instead of ink. Screen colors vary, so this is a screening curiosity, not a diagnosis: a real color-vision test uses calibrated plates, and the person to see about a real concern is an optometrist. Red-green colorblindness affects about 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women - if the plates above were hard, that is the normal way to be for millions of people.
The measurement family: the reaction time test and hearing age test cover the other two senses this site measures, and the stopwatch times everything else.

The Ishihara plates work by hiding a number in a field of confusable colors - and the principle renders perfectly in CSS: a number drawn in one color family inside dots of a confusable family. Three plates here: a demonstration plate (12 - everyone sees it, including every type of colorblindness), then two red-green screening plates that readers with deuteranomaly often miss.

Bottom line: red-green colorblindness affects about 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women - if the screening plates were hard, that is the normal way to be for millions of people, not a defect to fix. The types table explains which confusable family you sit in.

The honest part: screen colors vary by device, the plates are CSS rather than calibrated ink, and this is a screening curiosity - not a diagnosis. The person to see about a real color-vision question is an optometrist, whose plates and lighting are controlled.

How to use

  1. Read the dot field and type the number you see - then press Next plate and repeat for all three.
  2. Plate 1 is the demonstration (everyone reads 12); plates 2-3 are the red-green screeners.
  3. Check the types table: the pair you struggled with maps to one of the three colorblindness families.
Good to know โ€” The plate design: each renders a 14x12 field of dots in two color families - the number in one, the field in the other - with random jitter in size, shade and opacity to defeat pattern-matching. Plate 1 (12) uses high-contrast neutrals everyone reads; plates 2-3 use red-green confusable pairs. The population numbers: deuteranomaly ~5% of men, protanomaly ~1-2%, tritanomaly under 0.01% - and 1 in 12 men overall for red-green of either kind.
Quick reference โ€” Take the test on a calibrated or at least familiar screen in neutral lighting - night-mode blue filters and night-shift settings shift every color and can fake a miss. And if you failed the red-green plates: you share the trait with roughly 8% of men, several Nobel laureates, and most of the people who designed the color-blind-friendly traffic light patterns.

Frequently asked questions

What are the types of color blindness?

Three families: deuteranomaly (green-weak - greens, oranges and light reds blur together; the most common at roughly 5% of men), protanomaly (red-weak - reds appear darker than they are), and tritanomaly (blue-yellow, very rare at under 0.01%). Red-green in both variants affects about 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women, because the genes ride on the X chromosome.

Can color blindness develop later in life?

The inherited forms are stable from birth, but acquired color vision changes exist: cataracts, some medications, and optic-nerve conditions can shift color perception in adulthood - usually toward blue-yellow confusion and usually alongside other vision changes. A screening plate that suddenly reads differently than it did years ago is an optometrist conversation.

Is there a cure for color blindness?

No cure for the inherited forms, and none is urgently needed: colorblind people develop compensating strategies (brightness, position, context) that carry most of daily life. EnChroma-style tinted lenses shift some color distinctions for some wearers; the practical adaptations (color-blind-friendly palettes, labels, patterns) matter more in design.

Is this online test accurate?

It is a screening curiosity. Real Ishihara plates use calibrated ink densities under controlled lighting, and the scoring is done by a professional; screen colors vary by device, so this CSS version is the informal sibling. Its honest use: curiosity, party trick, and the first nudge toward an optometrist if the screening plates were surprisingly hard.

Related tools